منابع مشابه
Knowing How vs . Knowing That
More than forty years after Gilbert Ryle published his paper on "Knowing How and Knowing That" in 1945, 1 the problem of practical knowledge has still failed to establish for itself a secure position in the field of problems dealt with by analytic philosophers. Thus even today it can safely be asserted that it is discursive or theoretical knowledge, knowledge linguistically expressed, above all...
متن کاملOn Knowing the Category Before Knowing the Features
An assumption of all major accounts of categorization is that the system operates in a Features-First manner: a stimulus is mentally encoded in terms of observable properties which are then evaluated for fit to known categories. A testable prediction of this view is that people must know the features of an object before knowing what category it belongs to. Experimental results using a speeded v...
متن کاملEmancipatory knowing: Hidden necessity
Background & Aim: Knowledge patterns in nursing are key foundation elements for the development of knowledge and practice. Carper identified four fundamental knowledge patterns; empirical, personal, ethical and aesthetic. Chain and Kramer added the pattern of emancipatory knowledge to Carperchr('39')s patterns. The pattern of emancipatory knowledge in nursing has been neglected. The aim of this...
متن کامل``Knowing Whether,'' ``Knowing That,'' and The Cardinality of State Spaces
We introduce a new knowledge operator called ``knowing whether.'' Knowing whether an event occurred means either knowing that it occurred or knowing that it did not occur. We demonstrate the following difference between ``knowing whether'' and ``knowing that.'' In a multiple agent model, a sequence of events generated by successively applying ``knowing that'' operators, or their negations, may ...
متن کاملThe knowledge paradox: why knowing more is knowing less
To provide an explanation of the evolution of scientific knowledge, I start from the assumption that knowledge is based on concepts, and propose that each concept about reality is affected by vagueness. This entails a paradox, which I term Knowledge Paradox (KP): i.e. we need concepts to acquire knowledge about the real world but each concept is a step away from reality. The KP provides a unify...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Cultural Studies Review
سال: 1970
ISSN: 1837-8692,1446-8123
DOI: 10.5130/csr.v13i2.2133